From: fun2@SPAMBLOCK.arscc.com (David Gerard) Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Australia: another lawyer letter by email Date: 6 May 1997 08:20:15 GMT Organization: arscc.au and a.g.s-f Lines: 93 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: thingy.apana.org.au X-Newsreader: slrn (0.9.2.1 BETA UNIX) Xref: thingy.apana.org.au alt.religion.scientology:71860 They appear to be wishing to pursue this one. (I have deleted the phone details - if you really want to find them, you can look for them.) >From AnnaStiskal_at_Melbourne@dccgate.davies.com.au Tue May 6 18:10:51 1997 Date: Tue, 06 May 97 15:48:16 From: AnnaStiskal_at_Melbourne@dccgate.davies.com.au To: fun@suburbia.net.au Subject: Unauthorised Use of Copyright Material 6 May, 1997 Mr David Gerard PO Box 2097 Greville Street PRAHRAN VIC 3181 Our Ref: IRT:as:970125 Re: Unauthorised use of Copyright Material Dear Sir We refer to our letter to you dated 23 April 1997 and to your subsequent attempt on 2 May 1997 to contact our office by telephone. Despite numerous attempts to contact you on telephone number 9xxx xxyx (attempts were made to contact you on that number on Friday 2 May 1997, Monday 5 May 1997 and Tuesday 6 May 1997) we have been unable to speak with you in relation to this matter. On each occasion, the telephone has remained unanswered. In these circumstances, our client seeks your written response to the matters raised in our 23 April 1997 letter to you. Unless a comprehensive response has been received by us within five (5) days of the date of this letter, our client will consider its further options on the basis that you do not intend to respond to the allegations which have been made. Yours faithfully DAVIES RYAN DE BOOS enc >From fun@thingy.apana.org.au Tue May 6 18:11:52 1997 Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 18:07:49 +1000 (EST) From: David Gerard To: AnnaStiskal_at_Melbourne@dccgate.davies.com.au Cc: mail@davies.com.au Subject: Re: Unauthorised Use of Copyright Material On Tue, 6 May 1997 AnnaStiskal_at_Melbourne@dccgate.davies.com.au wrote: > We refer to our letter to you dated 23 April 1997 and to your > subsequent attempt on 2 May 1997 to contact our office by telephone. > Despite numerous attempts to contact you on telephone number 9xxx xxyx > (attempts were made to contact you on that number on Friday 2 May > 1997, Monday 5 May 1997 and Tuesday 6 May 1997) we have been unable to > speak with you in relation to this matter. On each occasion, the > telephone has remained unanswered. That is because my number is 9xxx xxxx, not 9xxx xxyx. What is a good time to phone Ian R. Taylor or the relevant person? I can call then. I certainly wish to discuss this matter. -- http://www.suburbia.net/~fun/scn/ http://wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de/~gerard/ (European mirror) http://208.199.189.75/fun/scn/ (US mirror - fast!)