Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 19:44:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Helena Kobrin To: gerdw@cougar.vut.EDU.AU Subject: unauthorized posting of copyright material Dear Mr. Gerard: I represent Religious Technology Center ("RTC"), the owner of the confidential Advanced Technology of the religion of Scientology, and the holder of the exclusive rights under the copyrights applicable to the Advanced Technology materials. Among these copyrighted and confidential materials are the Advanced Technology materials of a level known as "OT VII." The copyright for OT VII is registered with the United States Copyright Office under No. TXU-303-388. I have been informed that you have posted on alt.religion.scientology a portion of the OT VII materials without the authorization of my client, who, of course, would not have given such authorization had it been requested. Your action violates my client's legal rights in that it is the unauthorized making of an electronic copy of the copyrighted material and the unauthorized disclosure of trade secrets materials. These actions constitute violations of applicable copyright laws and trade secret misappropriation entitling our client to damages and an injunction. This is true regardless of whether you ever signed an agreement with respect to the confidentiality of the OT materials. You are on notice that they are regarded as trade secrets, and case law from several jurisdictions holds that an individual who is on notice is liable for trade secret misappropriation. The only way these materials could ever have left the church is through outright theft or misappropriation. It is essential that you take immediate and effective action to remove the unauthorized copy from the Internet, and that you refrain from any repetition of this or similar acts in the future. You are also to delete these and any other OT materials from your hard drive and any floppy disks and to destroy any hard copies you have made. In addition, your downloading of the copyright and trade secret materials also violates laws prohibiting copyright infringement and trade secret misappropriation. Your use and disclosure of these materials is *not* fair use. United States courts routinely find that the unpublished nature of a work is a factor which weighs against a finding of fair use. No court has ever found that use of stolen unpublished works is fair. There is also no fair use defense to trade secret misappropriation. The OT materials have been found to be trade secrets by the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in Bridge Publications, Inc. v. Vien, 827 F. Supp. 629, 633 (S.D. Cal. 1993). No court has ever ruled to the contrary. I will expect an immediate response from you with a statement of your willingness to comply with these demands. If you do not comply immediately, we will have no other recourse but to initiate legal action to compel compliance. Sincerely, Helena K. Kobrin